
An Associated Press article published in August 2011, Millions of U.S. Court Records Bound for Shredder, reported that at least 10 million bankruptcy case files along with several million additional district court files dating from 1970 through 1995 were scheduled to be shredded. Whether those files have already been torn to shreds or not, it begs the question: what to do with physical legal documents?
In this example, 10 million case files represent a huge amount of paper. A single case file could consist of ream upon ream of pages. From 1970 to 1995, electronic files where in their infancy and it's likely that the original court documents are the only copies in existence. Once these old
legal documents are shredded, they're gone for good. While digital technologies now exist, digitizing millions, if not billions, of pieces of paper is hardly practical. Storing massive amounts of physical court records indefinitely has its challenges as well.
Though the about-to-be-shredded U. S. court records may have been deemed insignificant and long-term storage isn't a practical option, once they're placed in the shredder, there's no going back. The Associated Press article listed historians and private investigators among those concerned about the outcome. Court records are often used to piece together stories from long ago. If the records disappear, those stories could disappear as well.
Of the case files set to be destroyed late this year and early next year, most have been deemed insignificant. For example, only criminal and civil cases that did not go to trial are destined for the shredder. Even so, they won't completely disappear as detailed docket sheets will be preserved. Historians and legal scholars reportedly analyzed the case files, keeping those that were deemed historically significant such as civil rights files or government corruption cases.
While the legal industry generates its fair share of paper today, electronic documents and online repositories could prevent future shredding controversies. In fact, your law firm likely has a record retention and destruction policy in place spelling out exactly how each document should be treated throughout its life cycle. For example, once a case file has been closed and culled of unnecessary material such as drafts and duplicate documents, your policy most likely specifies where it must be stored and for how long as well as how to ultimately destroy it once sufficient time has passed.
However, does your record retention and destruction policy address electronic documents? If not, now's the time to address it. Not only should you have a plan in place for the entire life cycle of physical case files, those electronic copies must also be secured, stored, and perhaps someday destroyed. With multiple hard drives, laptops, netbooks, USB drives, mobile devices, tape backups, online storage, and online repositories potentially being involved, it's also smart to address how and where any
electronic copies of any legal document should be handled. Your staff may know the importance of securing case files behind locked doors, but they might not think twice about sending a file over an unencrypted email connection or clipping a flash drive to a purse strap.
What do you think about the destruction of millions of U.S. court records? Did the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration have a good plan? What about the legal records in your own firm? When the time comes, will they be disposed of properly? Will you have safe and secure electronic copies as a backup? Asking questions now, could prevent the mishandling of legal documents later. Share your thoughts in the comments section below.